The Datchet Flying Fifteens
Saturday, 1 January 2011
Mylar v Dacron - options
Mylar v Dacron Mainsails (again!) - Voting Intentions
It adds a little bit of illumination on the subject of Mylar v Dacron, but the overall download article is actually excellent. Read the lot!!
You have to allow for the fact that H and I were lucky enough to get a good go in the sail testing session which VC arranged at Datchet - the very first Rig Testing session. H & I were pretty impressed at the time, but I'm beginning to wonder how much of that was being carried away by the whole atmosphere that weekend. I think we should go to the new designs of both jib and main - I thought that then and still do now. But lets get back to this issue of the switch to mylar mains.... Now why was that again?? We are just tumbling into a five year period of this parliament where cash for many will be severely constrained. Check the price of fuel next wednesday, and see what I mean. Now VC says he's been told that one of these new mylar mains will last 18 months, but what kind of 18 month period is that??
How many races do the big boys sail in 18 months on the circuit? Just work out your own estimate for the moment. Lets say 6 open meetings plus the Nationals. That's about 40 races perhaps? So 18 months could be 60 races - stay with me here .... If you race regularly with the Datchet Fleet, how many races do you sail in a year?? It would be in the range of 60-80 ... lets call it 80 for the minute - i.e. we take 12 weekends off in a year. So in 18 months, we race about 120 races on our sails. So if a Mylar main lasts 60 races, I have to replace it once every 9 months on average?? They would be 20% more expensive. I have a feeling that I just bought a Goacher Main a year ago and including delivery, it was the best part of £700. I expect it to last two years, maybe three. Lets look at two years - so that's £350 per year for dacron mainsails. The new mylar main is going to be around 20% more expensive - so maybe £830, but it has a life of 9 months??!! So that gives me an annual cost of mainsails running at around £1080. Have I got that right?? TRIPLE THE COST???!!! Have I got that right ?? None of this "20% more expensive" idea??!! My cost goes from £350 a year to £1080 a year?? Note that Non-Dom makes his Dacron main last 5 years, so imagine what his comparison is like!!!
How does this look to a prospective FF new comer (as opposed to us that already have one....), considering buying a good second-hand boat for maybe £5,000 ??? "Prohibitively expensive and out of proportion" is how that looks. Very off-putting - maybe "go and sail some other class", is the answer....
So suddenly with the help of several Blog contributors, my voting intentions in 2011 are now clear. For primarily the benefit of attracting newcomers to Club Racing, but also to the rest of us, I'm thinking I should vote "Yes" to the new jib and main designs, but "NO!!!" to the move from Dacron to Mylar.
Who's with me on that??
Friday, 31 December 2010
Sunday Racing Weather Outlook
See you there!!
Thursday, 30 December 2010
More mylar v dacron
2011 Four Day Eventing
22-25 April Easter
29-05 May Royal Wedding
04-07 June Diamond Jubilee
Given this plethora of time off from work, and the complete freedom of family commitments (!), should we as a Fleet do a special event (eg Hughsie style family regatta) on one of the weekends, or maybe have some idea which links two or three of the weekends together?? Ideas to the Fleet Captain please - and copy datchetman@flyingfifteen.com for putting on the blog to raise debate.
Wednesday, 29 December 2010
Dacron v Mylar/Laminated
> intention from day one was for the new main to be available in BOTH
> materials - Dicks demo sail was in Dacron. Sailmakers are naturally keen on
> laminated NOT because of cost, but they don't last as long! Laminated 5o5
> genoas last a REGATTA only!! I hope the dual option still is being offered.
>
> Laminated Main would look "new" and "Modern" - we don't use cotton sails
> anymore so progress isn't a bad thing! It's also lighter aloft so helps
> lighter crews. It's also see through - making the Millars less of a hazard!!
> Dacron Main lasts longer, is a proven product and would be more forgiving.
>
> Certainly the new genoa will be suitable for use with your existing main -
> giving some advantage without shelling out for a new suit straight away.
>
> Let's all have a good look in Feb when the suits of sails are with us - and
> a year old at least!
>
> VC
>
Tuesday, 28 December 2010
Mike Firth's blog Mylar Vs Dacron
> I recently visited my sail maker - as in McNamara - and
> discussed both Mylar and Dacron. He had equivalent rolls of material of each
> in stock and I can confirm that the Mylar 'felt' marginally lighter, As a
> raw material the Mylar costs the sail maker between 35% and 40% more than
> the equivalent amount of Dacron, I was given to understand that the labour
> and skills involved in manufacture were similar.
>
> I was advised that in comparable circumstances, as in dinghies and small
> keel boats, we should expect the Mylar to have approx half the life of
> Dacron. To be more specific Mylar is particularly sensitive to abrasion and
> flapping/flogging - they call it 'wragging' -. The growth of Mylar on the
> dinghy scene is associated with the growth of the new generation of bow
> sprit skiffs - euphemistically some times referred to as lollipop boats -
> where the latest materials are 'derigour' and the 'image'. The self taking
> jibs on these craft are heavily supported by reinforcement and battens,
> whilst the majority of mainsails are fully battened. Plus they are rigged on
> shore, where the carefully rolled mainsail can be fed up the mast, where it
> will be supported by the battens thus eliminating a degree of flapping.
>
> With the Flying 15, in the case of the foresail/genoa, the consequent
> overlap causing abrasion on the mast plus furling, means that Mylar is an
> unsuitable material. In the case of the mainsail, which is not fully
> battened and hence less supported, one also has to consider all that Mylar
> 'scrunched up' in the floor of the cockpit prior to hoist. This is where a
> substantial amount of attrition will occur, in addition that on the race
> course.
>
> Two significant other established dinghy classes have adopted a Mylar option
> for their Mainsails, the Fireball and The GP14. In the case of the Fireball,
> a class that was significantly under pressure from the skiff type craft, the
> members voted for the for the option because they believed it would update
> the image of the class. The average retail price hike between a Dacron and a
> Mylar mainsail on the Fireball is 22%.
>
> In the case of the GP14, the council made the decision to allow a Mylar
> option, there was no vote invited from the membership. The GP14 situation is
> quite similar to that of the Flying 15, where just a few sail makers seem to
> have developed a bit of a monopoly - cartel is perhaps too strong an
> interpretation - nevertheless some members of the GP fleet were bemused by
> the decision towards mylar. In the case of the GP14 the average retail price
> hike is just over 19%.
>
> So there we have it, Mylar costs more and sails made of this material will
> have a weight benefit, but unless correctly supported, will have a shorter
> life. Currently sailmakers are charging substantially less for a complete
> sail, than the increase in the cost of the raw material used. Is this
> because they are trying to establish a new market segment or do they expect
> to make twice as many sails long term?
>
> Non Dom
> 3559